참고자료

Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.271

Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.61

Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2013.54.600

Open access: changing global science publishing
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2013.54.403

Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2582-2 

Biomedical journal editing: elements of success 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2011.52.423 

Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2012.53.386 

Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3 

Peer review in scholarly biomedical journals: a few things that make a big difference 
http://www.ease.org.uk/resources/journal/archive/may-2012-382 

Familiarizing with science editors’ associations 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2011.52.735

Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2276-1